247028

Extension of Permission for Planning Ref. 19/1065: the removal of existing single storey section at the side of the dwelling and construction of a single storey extension to the side of the dwelling, construction of a shed to the other side of the dwelling, modifications to the existing dwelling, new boundary treatment along the northern boundary to the side and rear of the dwelling and all ancillary site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The application for an extension of duration was refused because the permitted development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out on-site, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • A site inspection conducted on 23/01/25 confirmed that the subject site remains entirely undeveloped.
  • The applicant's own submission acknowledged that no works associated with the original planning permission (Ref. 19/1065) have commenced to date.
  • The proposal fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(iii) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), which mandates that substantial works must be completed to qualify for an extension of duration for un-commenced developments.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

Maurice & Tina O'Brien applied for an extension of duration for a previously permitted development (Ref. 19/1065) involving the construction of a house extension, a shed, and ancillary site works at 25 Fortfield, Raheen, Co. Limerick. Following a site inspection, the Planning Authority determined that the development had not yet commenced. The application was refused as it did not meet the legislative criteria under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires substantial ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.