Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extension is considered a second dwelling unit due to its layout and scale, which is excessive for the site and contrary to residential zoning objectives.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development description is misleading as the design and layout, including multiple kitchens and living areas, effectively create a second independent dwelling unit.
- The size, scale, and positioning of the extension are excessive and fail to respect the character of the host dwelling or its existing setting.
- The proposal fails to comply with specific development plan policies regarding family flats and residential amenity protection under the 'RS' zoning objective.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQHP41Objective SPQHO45Section 14.10.3Policy SPQHP42Objective SPQH046
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a single-storey side and rear extension at 33A River Valley Grove, Swords. However, Fingal County Council refused the application because the internal configuration—featuring multiple kitchens and living spaces—suggested the creation of a separate dwelling rather than a standard extension. Furthermore, the scale of the build was deemed disproportionate to the original house, violating policies on family flats and residential amenity within the Fingal Developme...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.