Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed two-storey extension was refused due to its excessive height, scale, and proximity to the southern boundary, which would result in overlooking and a dominating impact on the residential amenity of the adjoining property.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension's design and height would lead to direct overlooking and a loss of privacy for the neighboring property to the south.
- The scale of the development is disproportionate to the surrounding built environment, creating an overly imposing and dominating visual appearance.
- The proposal would seriously injure the residential amenities of the area and is contrary to the principles of proper planning and sustainable development.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The application at Moortown, Oldtown, sought a split decision for the retention of an existing first-floor extension and permission for a new two-storey rear extension. While the planning authority granted retention for the existing works subject to conditions ensuring the unit remains part of a single dwelling, the proposed new extension was refused. The refusal was based on the structure's height and proximity to the southern boundary, which the authority deemed would cause significant overloo...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.