Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector determined that while the scale and bulk of the proposed dormer are acceptable given the house's extended state and deep garden, the grant should be amended via a revised Condition 2 to require centralizing the dormer and reversing the window configuration to better protect residential amenity and ensure orderly development.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The bulk and scale of the 4m wide dormer can be absorbed by the existing dwelling and site context without negatively impacting the character of the area.
- Proposed separation distances to the rear exceed 16m, which is deemed acceptable under SPPR 1 and minimizes risk of significant overlooking.
- The Planning Authority's requirements to reduce the dormer size and set it below the ridge line were unnecessary, but modest design adjustments are required for better integration and privacy.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQH41Objective SPQH045Section 14.1Section 14.6Section 14.6.6.4Section 14.10.2.5
Decision Document Summary
This Inspector's Report addresses a first-party appeal against a restrictive condition (Condition 2) imposed by Fingal County Council on a grant for a dormer window extension at 23 Burnell Park Green, Castleknock. The Planning Authority sought to reduce the dormer's width to 3m and require a 300mm set-down from the ridge line to ensure subordinacy. The appellant argued these changes would render the attic space non-viable for use as a home office and cited local precedents where larger dormers w...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.