Core Refusal Reason
The development obstructs the public footpath, creates a safety hazard, and inappropriately privatizes public on-street parking space for private use.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The charging arm reduces footpath width and creates a trip hazard, endangering public safety and violating pedestrian protection policies.
- The structure overhangs the public realm without legal consent from the Roads Section, which is contrary to taking-in-charge standards and sets a poor precedent.
- The proposal effectively privatizes public on-street parking for private use, conflicting with city-wide parking management policies and operational kerbside activities.
Cited Policies (CDP)
SMT18Volume 2, Appendix 5, Section 8.3SMT 25
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for an existing electric vehicle charging arm at 44 Home Farm Road, Dublin 9. The proposal was refused because the infrastructure encroaches upon the public footpath, creating physical obstructions and safety risks for pedestrians. Furthermore, the development lacks necessary legal consent for overhanging the public realm and improperly utilizes public on-street parking for private charging purposes, which contradicts Dublin City Council's policies on...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.