Core Refusal Reason
The application for extension of duration was refused because development had not yet commenced, failing to meet the statutory requirements of the Planning and Development Act.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The particulars submitted with the application confirm that development works have not yet commenced on the site.
- The application fails to satisfy the mandatory criteria for an extension of duration as set out under Section 42 (1)(a)(i) I & III of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
- While the extension was refused, the original permission remains valid until 31/05/2025 due to the application of Section 251-A of the Act.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for a permitted shared vehicular access gateway at 15 & 16 Mulvey Park, Dundrum. The local authority refused the extension on the grounds that no development had commenced, which is a prerequisite for an extension under the cited sections of the Planning and Development Act. Despite the refusal of the extension request, the Planning Authority noted that the statutory 'COVID-19' extension period under Section 251-A applies, effectively pushing the ori...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.