Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommends a grant of permission as the proposed extension is subordinate in scale and height to the existing dwelling, complies with the Fingal Development Plan's standards for separation distances and private open space, and will not significantly impact the residential or visual amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension is acceptable in principle under the 'RS' zoning and is designed to be subordinate to the existing dwelling, matching its finishes and fenestration.
- Technical analysis, including a Daylight and Sunlight Analysis Report, confirms that the impact on neighbouring properties (Nos. 60 and 62 Cedar Park) regarding loss of light and overshadowing will be marginal and not significant.
- The development maintains a separation distance of 22.8 metres from opposing rear windows and retains the required 60sqm of private open space, thus protecting the residential amenity of adjoining owners.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029Zoning 'RS' ResidentialSPQHP41SPQHO45Objective DAO11Objective DMSO105Objective DMSO23Objective DMSO26Objective DMSO27Section 14.10.2Section 14.10.2.3Section 14.10.2.4
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a two-storey rear extension at 61 Cedar Park, Swords, comprising a 50sqm ground floor and an 18.9sqm first floor. Fingal County Council granted permission, which was subsequently appealed by a third party (No. 62 Cedar Park) citing concerns over overshadowing, overbearing impact, and potential subdivision. The Inspector's assessment found that the first-floor element is appropriately set back from the common boundary to mitigate dominance. He noted the extensi...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.