WEB1389/25
RETENTION :The development will consist of: Retention of the existing temporary telecommunications structure, for a defined period of 24 months, consisting of a 15m transportable monopole structure secured by 4 anchor bolts to 4 No. 2m x 2m x 1m removable concrete ballast blocks; & all associated antennas, dishes and ancillary ground-based equipment cabinets. Situated within the construction site hoarding on a section of land at 80 - 82 Philipsburgh Avenue, Fairview, Dublin 3, D03H3F1.
Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended a grant of permission as the temporary structure is considered a 'public service installation' which is permissible under the Z9 zoning, is technically necessary for the continuity of telecommunications services during site redevelopment, and its significant visual impact is mitigated by its temporary nature and the context of the active construction site.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The retention of the telecommunications structure is deemed a 'public service installation' and is a permissible use under the Z9 zoning objective for the site.
- While the 17.2m structure is visually prominent, its impact is acceptable on a temporary basis as it stands within an active construction site and is scheduled for removal by September 2026.
- The applicant has provided sufficient justification for the structure to maintain essential coverage in the area until permanent equipment is moved to the roof of the permitted residential development.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the retention of a temporary transportable monopole (noted as 17.2m in height despite 15m in public notices) and associated cabinets at 80-82 Philipsburgh Avenue, Dublin 3. The site is currently undergoing deep excavation for a permitted 48-apartment development. A third-party appeal by local residents raised concerns regarding visual dominance in a residential area, health risks from radiation, and property devaluation. The Inspector found that the mast is a necessary rein...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP