3098/25

PROTECTED STRUCTURE : The development will consist of the replacement of 1No. illuminated 12.85m x 3.5m advertising display with 1No. digital 6.28m by 3.4m advertising display at the side gable of 41 Upper Gardiner Street , Dublin 1 , a protected structure and all associasted site works and services .

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

While the Planning Authority initially refused permission, the Inspector recommends granting the appeal because the 50% reduction in the scale of advertising on the gable of a protected structure, combined with the decommissioning of another billboard nearby, results in a net benefit to the built heritage and general streetscape.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed 50% reduction in advertising area improves the legibility and setting of the protected structure and the surrounding conservation area.
  • The decommissioning of an additional off-site billboard at Gardiner Place satisfies the requirements for rationalization of signage and represents a significant planning gain.
  • Operational controls such as night-time sleep modes and luminance limits ensure that the digital display will not negatively impact residential amenity on Dorset Street.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 7.5.9Section 11.5.3Section 14.6Policy BHA2Policy BHA9Policy CCUV45Policy CCUV46Appendix 17

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns a first-party appeal by JCDecaux Ireland Limited following Dublin City Council's refusal of permission to replace an existing 45sqm paper billboard with a 21sqm digital display at 41 Upper Gardiner Street, a protected structure. The site is located at a prominent junction in a Z4 'key urban village' zone and within a conservation area. The Planning Authority refused the proposal on the grounds of negative visual impact on architectural character and insufficient planning gai...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP