WEB1490/25

The construction of a new vehicular access from The Rise and related vehicular parking area in the front garden of the existing house and all associated site works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Planning Authority initially refused permission because the proposed vehicular entrance would require the removal of a street tree, which they deemed contrary to tree protection policies; however, the Inspector recommends a grant of permission, concluding that the tree can be preserved through a modified entrance design.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development supports policies for an aging population and climate action by facilitating independent living and electric vehicle charging through off-street parking.
  • The retention of the existing street tree is achievable and preferable by conditioning a revised entrance layout that combines the pedestrian and vehicular access into a single opening.
  • A 1.5m clearance from the tree trunk, combined with a financial security bond for the tree's protection, provides a reasonable compromise between residential amenity and infrastructure requirements.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Z1Objective CA04Policy QHSN18Section 15.6.9Section 15.6.10Section 15.6.11Appendix 5 Section 4.0Appendix 5 Section 4.3.1Appendix 5 Section 4.3.2Dublin City Tree Strategy 2016-2020

Decision Document Summary

The application involves the creation of a vehicular entrance and off-street parking area at a semi-detached house in Glasnevin. Dublin City Council refused the proposal due to the impact on a street tree and the precedent it would set. The applicants appealed, highlighting their need for EV charging and accessibility as they age, citing Policy QHSN18. The Inspector notes that while the Development Plan generally protects street trees, it also seeks to facilitate modern living and climate object...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP