Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out during the original permission period as required by legislation.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The application does not meet the statutory criteria set out in Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
- Substantial works were not carried out on the site pursuant to the original planning permission granted.
- The planning authority is not satisfied that the requirements for an extension of duration of the permission have been fulfilled.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a development at 5 Maretimo Place, Blackrock, Co. Dublin. The request was refused by the local authority on the grounds that the applicant failed to prove that substantial works had been completed during the initial lifespan of the permission. As the development did not meet the specific legislative threshold required under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, the extension could not be granted....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.