Core Reason for the Refused Part
The retention of the log cabin and two-storey rear extension was refused due to material contravention of Green Belt zoning, non-compliance with the Rural Settlement Strategy, and significant negative impact on the visual amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The detached log cabin functions as a separate dwelling unit, which fails to meet the Rural Settlement Strategy and materially contravenes the 'GB - Green Belt' land use zoning objective.
- The two-storey rear extension is considered excessive in scale, massing, and design, appearing visually incongruous and injurious to the character of the existing streetscape.
- Granting retention for these structures would set an undesirable precedent for unauthorized rural development and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
GB – Green BeltRural Settlement StrategyPolicy SPQHP41 – Residential ExtensionsObjective SPQHO45 – Domestic Extensions
Decision Document Summary
The application at Briar Cottage, Lanistown, sought permission for a new entrance and rooflights, while also seeking to retain a detached log cabin and a two-storey rear extension. While the Planning Authority granted permission for the new entrance and rooflights subject to conditions, it refused the retention elements. The refusal was based on the log cabin's status as an unauthorized separate unit in a Green Belt zone and the extension's failure to integrate visually with the surrounding area...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.