Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the removal of Condition 2, concluding that the proposed dormer width of 3 metres and its set-down from the ridge are proportionate to the host dwelling, consistent with established local planning precedents, and do not negatively impact the visual amenity of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 3-metre dormer width is visually balanced and proportionate to the dwelling's 5.6-metre roof extent, whereas the Planning Authority's required reduction to 2.5 metres would create a visual imbalance.
- There is a documented inconsistency in the Planning Authority's decision-making, as a 3-metre wide dormer was recently permitted and implemented at No. 7 Luttrellpark Court, establishing a local precedent.
- The proposed development complies with the RS zoning objective and Section 14.10.2.5 of the Development Plan, as it matches the emerging residential character of the wider Sheepmoor and Castleknock areas.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029Chapter 13 (Land Use Zoning - RS Residential)Chapter 14 (Development Management Standards)Section 14.10.2.5 (Roof Alterations including Attic Conversions and Dormer Extensions)
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a first-party appeal against Condition No. 2 of a planning grant for an attic conversion at 13 Luttrellpark Court, a semi-detached dwelling in a cul-de-sac. The Planning Authority (PA) granted permission but imposed Condition 2 to reduce the dormer width from 3m to 2.5m and enforce a 300mm ridge set-down. The Inspector argues that the 3m width is more harmonious with the roof profile than the PA's recommendation. The Inspector cites significant precedent, specifically a s...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.