Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate sufficient legal interest or ownership of the entire application site, specifically a grassed area included within the redline boundary.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- Discrepancies persist between the redline application boundary and the blueline ownership boundary regarding a 4m x 24m grassed area to the west of the existing dwelling.
- The applicant failed to provide revised site layout maps or documentation proving ownership or third-party consent for all lands included in the proposal despite requests for Additional Information.
- The Planning Authority is legally precluded from granting permission because the applicant has not established sufficient legal estate or interest in the lands subject to the application.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought outline permission for a new two-storey detached dwelling on a corner site at 173 Woodfield, Dublin 16. The application was refused because the applicant included a grassed area within the development boundary (redline) that was not shown to be within their ownership (blueline). Despite multiple opportunities to resolve this through Additional Information and Clarification stages, the applicant failed to provide the necessary proof of title or landowner consent, resulting in ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.