WEB1685/25
RETENTION: The development consists of: Proposed extension of time to the temporary retention permission for previously approved reg .ref. 3264/21: Stretched Skin Structure, supported by steel columns, which accommodates silent fitness classes on the grounds of Dartry Health Club; Classes to take place Monday - Friday 7am - 8.15pm, Saturday 9am- 4pm, Sunday 10am - 1.20pm; and 3985/22 10ft Shipping container wrapped in artificial foliage to cater for gym classes; and all associated site and landscaping works
Core Refusal Reason
The retention of the development would result in the loss of all on-site car parking, leading to unacceptable overspill and haphazard parking on adjacent residential roads, which would injure residential amenity and endanger public safety in the absence of a supporting mobility strategy.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The cessation of the Covid-19 pandemic constitutes a material change in circumstances, removing the original justification for temporary outdoor fitness structures.
- The development has resulted in the total removal of on-site car parking, directly contributing to unacceptable parking congestion and overspill on surrounding residential streets like Palmerston Gardens.
- The absence of a robust mobility management plan or adequate cycle parking means the applicant has failed to mitigate the traffic impacts, making the proposal contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought the retention of a 15m x 13m 'stretched skin' tent structure and a storage shipping container at Dartry Health Club to facilitate outdoor fitness classes. The site is zoned Z9 and is situated adjacent to a Z2 Residential Conservation Area. While local residents raised significant objections regarding noise and visual intrusion, the Inspector found that the 'silent' nature of the classes and the screened location made these issues secondary. However, the critical planning con...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP