Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the proposed two-storey extension is a high-quality design that integrates well with the suburban character of the area, respects the building line, and addresses previous refusal reasons by reducing the depth of the front extension.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed two-storey front and side extension is appropriate in its context and would not adversely impact the visual amenities, streetscape, or character of the established residential area.
- The development will not result in undue overshadowing, overlooking, or overbearing impacts on the adjoining property at no. 6 Dean Swift Green, as the extension adjoins a windowless gable wall and maintains a respectful height.
- A standard car parking space (3m x 5m) can be successfully accommodated within the front curtilage based on revised measurements (5.4m depth), meaning the previously proposed condition to omit the vehicular entrance is unwarranted.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning Objective Z1: Sustainable Residential NeighbourhoodsAppendix 18, Section 1.0 (General Design Principles for Extensions)Appendix 18, Section 1.1 (Front Extensions)Appendix 18, Section 1.3 (Side Extensions)Appendix 18, Section 1.4 (Privacy and Amenity)Appendix 18, Section 1.7 (Appearance and Materials)Appendix 5, Section 4.3 (Parking in Front Gardens)Appendix 5, Section 4.3.1 (Basic Dimensions for Car Parking)
Decision Document Summary
The application involves the demolition of a shed and the construction of a 52sqm two-storey front and side extension at 7 Dean Swift Green, Glasnevin, a triangular corner site. While the Planning Authority granted permission but required the omission of the vehicular entrance, the Inspector's assessment focused on design approach, residential amenity, and traffic safety. A previous 2019 refusal on the site was mitigated by reducing the front extension's projection to 1.5m. The Inspector address...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP