Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommends the removal of Condition No. 2, concluding that the proposed flat roof design for the side annex is a reasonable and functional solution that facilitates adaptable housing needs with minimal visual impact and no significant injury to the residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed design is a reasonable architectural solution that supports the Development Plan objective for adaptable housing to meet changing family circumstances.
- The visual impact on the streetscape is mitigated by the annex's significant 3m setback from the front elevation and the screening provided by mature trees on the adjacent footpath.
- The increased height and rear extension of the annex will not significantly injure the amenities of the adjacent property (No. 4 College Grove) regarding overlooking, overshadowing, or loss of privacy.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Chapter 14: Development Management StandardsSection 14.1: IntroductionSection 14.10: Additional Accommodation in Existing Built-up AreasSection 14.10.2: Residential ExtensionsSection 14.10.2.2: Side ExtensionsSection 14.10.2.5: Roof Alterations including Attic Conversions and Dormer Extensions
Decision Document Summary
This Inspector's Report evaluates a first-party appeal under Section 139 against Condition 2 of Fingal County Council's decision to grant permission for an extension at 6 College Grove, Castleknock. The condition required the developer to omit a proposed flat roof over a side annex and retain the original sloping roof profile to preserve the area's visual character. The site comprises a standard two-storey detached dwelling in a suburban layout where side annexes are a defining characteristic. T...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.