WEB1935/25
PROTECTED STRUCTURE : RETENTION :a) Widening of previous gateway from 2.1m to 3.2m to provide vehicular entrance to off-street parking and electrical charging points including relocation of gate piers. b) Alterations to existing iron railings and gate to provide automated double gate.
Refused
Core Refusal Reason
The development is recommended for refusal due to the irretrievable loss of original historic fabric of a Protected Structure, which injures its architectural character and symmetry, alongside the unacceptable loss of on-street parking contrary to the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The widening of the gateway and relocation of gate piers results in an irretrievable loss of significant historic fabric, permanently altering the carefully designed relationship between the entrance and the Protected Structure.
- The removal of an on-street parking space reduces the supply available to residents and the public in an area where 50% of properties are reliant on such parking, contrary to the presumption against such removals in Appendix 5 of the Development Plan.
- The provision of EV charging points, while supported by government policy, does not provide sufficient justification for the retention of works that negatively impact the architectural heritage and residential amenities of the Z2 conservation area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SMT1Policy SMT2Policy SMT25Paragraph 8.5.7Policy BHA 2Policy BHA 9Appendix 5, Section 4.1Section 13.4.3Policy MT14 (2016-2022 Plan)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal seeks the retention of a widened gateway (2.1m to 3.2m), relocated gate piers, and automated double gates at 32 Kenilworth Square West, a detached Protected Structure in a Z2 Residential Conservation area. The works were intended to provide off-street parking and two EV charging points. The Inspector notes a previous refusal (Ref: 303136) for a similar proposal on this site. While the applicant argues that on-site parking frees up street spaces and supports modern living, the Inspec...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP