Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development represents a piecemeal and uncoordinated approach to backland development in the absence of a masterplan, which would set an undesirable precedent and negatively impact the established residential amenity and character of the Corduff Cottages enclave.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- While the principle of infill residential development on RS-zoned lands is supported by policy, the proposal represents a piecemeal and uncoordinated approach that fails to adequately consider the existing pattern of parking, storage, and access for the terrace.
- The granting of permission would set an inappropriate precedent for similar incremental developments that would progressively erode the character of the area and displace existing on-street parking onto Old Corduff Road, detrimental to public safety.
- The proposed localized widening of the laneway is insufficient to address the broader structural deficiencies and restricted width of the access route, which requires a holistic and coordinated masterplan approach to ensure safe and sustainable access.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029Zoning Objective RSPolicy CSP12Policy SPQHP38Objective SPQHO37Objective SPQHO39Objective SPQHO42Objective DMS031Section 14.10.1
Decision Document Summary
The applicant proposed the construction of two three-bedroom, single-storey detached dwellings on a backland site to the rear of 11 and 12 Corduff Cottages in Blanchardstown. The site is currently part of a green space accessed via a narrow (approx. 2.7m - 4.0m) communal laneway. Fingal County Council refused permission due to concerns over the loss of private amenity space and substandard access. Upon appeal, the Inspector found the principle of development acceptable under the 'RS' zoning and ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.