D25A/0375/WEB

The refurbishment and extension of the second floor accommodation to the existi

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Planning Authority refused permission because the roof modifications and wraparound balcony were deemed to compromise the original structure and detract from the character of the Killiney Architectural Conservation Area. However, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the roof works are necessary for maintenance and acceptable in scale, provided the balcony is omitted via condition.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed roof modifications are minor in nature and necessary to prevent further deterioration from water leakage, and they will not be visually discordant within the varied roofscapes of the ACA.
  • The proposed wraparound balcony is an unnecessary and unsatisfactory addition that would detract from the decorative clay brickwork and architectural integrity of the period dwelling's elevations.
  • Permission should be granted subject to conditions requiring the omission of the balcony and the retention of existing fenestration to ensure the development respects the character of the building and the surrounding conservation area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective HER13Section 11.4.2Policy Objective HER14Policy Objective HER21Section 12.3.7.1Section 12.11.4Specific Local Objective 130

Decision Document Summary

The application relates to 'Lismellow', a large 19th-century detached house in the Killiney Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). The applicant sought permission for the refurbishment and extension of the second-floor attic space, involving a new roof profile and a glazed wraparound balcony. Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council refused permission, arguing the design would compromise the historic roof structure and streetscape. The Inspector's assessment found that the roof works were justified...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP