Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development represents overdevelopment of a constricted and prominent corner site within the Malahide Core Architectural Conservation Area, where the scale, mass, and design elements—specifically the large blank elevations and roof profile—fail to integrate with the established pattern of development or protect the setting of the adjacent Protected Structure.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposal, due to its physical scale and specific design features such as blank solid elevations and a mix of roof finishes, is an ineffective response to the sensitivities of the Malahide Core Architectural Conservation Area.
- The subdivision of the garden of No. 6 Castle Terrace would negatively impact the Protected Structure by removing its off-street parking and cutting off vehicular access required for future maintenance and upkeep.
- The proposed dwelling sits above the eaves level of the historic terrace and lacks sufficient contextual documentation to demonstrate that it would not visually dominate or detract from the character and setting of the existing Protected Structures.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy HCAP12Objective HCAO24Objective SPQHO39Objective SPQHO42Objective SPQHO43Objective DMSO19Objective DMSO31Objective DMSO32Objective DMSO23Objective DAO-11Section 14.10.1Table 14.4Table 14.19
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a contemporary two-storey, two-bedroom infill dwelling of approximately 100sqm on a corner site at the junction of St. Margaret’s Road and a cul-de-sac. The site currently forms part of the long rear garden of No. 6 Castle Terrace, which is a Protected Structure. While located in a central area zoned for 'Town and District Centre' use and close to public transport, the site is highly sensitive due to its location within the Malahide Core Architectural Conserva...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.