Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed attic conversion, dormer extension, and increased ridge height are considered visually intrusive, out of character with the single-storey cottage terrace, and contrary to development plan standards regarding roof extensions.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The full-width dormer extension would obscure the original roof profile and create the appearance of an additional storey, which is inappropriate for this cottage type.
- The proposed increase in ridge height would disrupt the uniform roofline of the terrace and negatively impact the character of the streetscape.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments within this specific enclave of single-storey cottages, injurious to the visual amenities of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 5.0 of Appendix 18 of the Dublin City Development Plan (2022-2028)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal at 77 Harolds Cross Cottages sought a split development consisting of a ground-floor rear extension and an attic conversion featuring a full-width dormer and raised ridge line. While the ground-floor works were granted permission, the attic elements were refused. The planning authority determined that the scale of the dormer and the alteration to the roof profile would be visually dominant and out of character with the existing terrace of single-storey cottages, failing to comply wi...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.