Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development would negatively impact the architectural character and historic fabric of a Protected Structure through insensitive extensions and alterations.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The provision of a full-width first-floor rear extension and the conversion of five original windows into doorways would result in the loss of significant historic fabric.
- The proposed works would obscure the legibility of the original rear elevation and diminish the special interest and visual integrity of the Protected Structure.
- The proposal materially contravenes development plan policies requiring that works to Protected Structures are sensitively designed and respect architectural significance.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy Objective HER8Section 12.11.2.1
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought to change the use of a 64sqm veterinary surgery at Overton, a Protected Structure in Dundrum, into residential use, involving a first-floor rear extension and alterations to original window openings. The local authority refused permission because the scale and design of the proposed works were considered insensitive to the historic context. The development was found to adversely affect the architectural character and legibility of the structure, thereby failing to comply with...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.