Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority refused permission on the grounds that the rear dormer window was excessive in scale and lacked a sufficient set-down from the ridge, contravening Objective SPQHO45. However, the Board Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the 100mm set-down was acceptable in context and would not dominate the roof or injure visual amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is acceptable in principle under the 'RS' zoning objective, which supports residential extensions that protect and improve residential amenity.
- The scale and design of the dormer window, including a nominal 100mm set-down from the ridge, are considered appropriate in the context of the enlarged roof and established local precedents.
- The development will have minimal visibility from the public realm and is designed to ensure no negative impact on the privacy or amenities of neighboring properties via overlooking or overshadowing.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective SPQHO45Policy SPQHP41Section 14.10.2.5Zoning Objective RS
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for alterations to a detached bungalow at 9 Del Val Avenue, Bayside, involving a rear dormer window, an extension of the pitched roof to the north, and various rooflights. While the Planning Authority refused the application due to concerns regarding the dormer's dominance and lack of ridge set-down, the Inspector argued that the proposal is consistent with the Fingal County Development Plan 2023-2029. The site is in a suburban area where many roofs have been mod...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.