WEB2445/25

Demolition of existing single storey extensions; construction of new single and two storey extensions; attic conversion to habitable use with 2No. dormer windows to the rear; provision of rooflights, internal alterations and all associated site works

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommends granting permission because the development is considered subordinate in scale to the original dwelling, respects the established streetscape character, and includes mitigation measures (screening) to ensure no significant negative impact on the residential amenities of adjoining properties.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed extensions are visually subordinate to the principal house and maintain the semi-detached rhythm of Nutley Park by incorporating appropriate setbacks that prevent a terracing effect.
  • Concerns regarding overlooking from the proposed south-facing kitchen window can be satisfactorily mitigated through the installation of a 1.8m high screen, as secured by planning condition.
  • The overall development, including the attic conversion and dormer windows, is consistent with the standards set out in the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 and will not result in undue injury to the area's character or residential amenity.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods)Appendix 18 (Ancillary Residential Accommodation)Section 1.1 (General Design Principles)Section 1.2 (Extensions to rear)Section 1.3 (Extensions to side)Section 1.4 (Privacy and Amenity)Section 1.6 (Daylight and Sunlight)Section 1.7 (Appearance and Materials)Section 4.0 (Alterations at Roof Level)Section 5.0 (Attic Conversions)

Decision Document Summary

The application at 44 Nutley Park, Donnybrook, seeks permission for the demolition of existing single-storey side/rear structures and the construction of a substantial ground and first-floor extension, plus an attic conversion with two rear dormers. The site is a 0.065-hectare plot featuring a semi-detached house backing onto a golf course in a mature residential area. A third-party appeal by the neighbor at No. 42 raised issues of overlooking, boundary encroachment, and the loss of privacy from...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP