Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended granting permission, overturning the Planning Authority's refusal, on the basis that the applicant satisfied rural housing residency requirements for the South Shore area and the proposed development was visually acceptable and met functional internal standards.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant successfully demonstrated over 10 years of residency in the South Shore area, thereby complying with the specific Rural Settlement Strategy requirements of Objective SPQHO92.
- The proposed first-floor extension is considered subordinate to the main dwelling and visually integrated, posing no significant negative impact on the 'Highly Sensitive Landscape' or the local streetscape.
- Internal accommodation standards are deemed acceptable as the overall floor area exceeds requirements, and minor technical shortfalls in bedroom sizes do not render the unit substandard.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQHP45Policy SPQHP46Objective SPQHO92Objective SPQHO93Objective SPQHO94Policy SPQHP41Objective SPQHO45Policy GINHP9Objective DMSO19Objective DMSO27Section 14.10.2.4Section 14.12.11Table 14.17Table 14.19Objective SPQHP48
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal by Niall Bollard against Fingal County Council's decision to refuse permission for the conversion of a granny flat into a separate 3-bedroom residential unit and the construction of a c. 23 sqm first-floor rear extension at 59 Channel Road, Rush. The Planning Authority originally refused the application due to concerns regarding rural housing policy, substandard internal dimensions, and visual impact. Inspector Ian Campbell's assessment found that the ap...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.