WEB1141/21

Modifications to the previously approved unbuilt 3 bedroom 2 storey detached house per App. No. 2374/13 ( and the subsequent extension of duration of permission per App. 2374/13X1) to provide 1 No. 4 bedroom 2 storey detached house on a larger footprint & increasing the gross floor area from 112 to 152 sqm with attic conversion including a rear dormer roof & 2 front rooflights. The level of the roof is being raised and attic storage is being converted to additional/4th bedroom, & all associated works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Inspector recommended a grant of permission subject to conditions, concluding that while the increased building footprint was acceptable, the proposed increase in ridge height and the scale of the box dormer would be visually obtrusive and incongruous with the established character of the terrace.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The principle of an infill dwelling is acceptable at this location given the Z1 residential zoning and the planning history of the site, which includes an extant permission for a detached house.
  • The proposed increase in ridge height and the wide box dormer would result in a visually discordant form of development that fails to respect the proportions and height of the existing terrace of houses at Nos. 34-40 Edenmore Avenue.
  • The proposed increases in width and depth of the dwelling are acceptable in terms of visual and residential amenity, provided the roof ridge height and profile match the existing terrace.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective Z1Section 16.10.9 (Corner/Side Garden Sites)Section 16.10.10 (Infill Housing)Appendix 17 (Residential Extensions)Paragraph 17.11 of Appendix 17 (Dormer windows)

Decision Document Summary

This appeal relates to a proposal for modifications to a previously permitted 3-bedroom detached house on a corner garden site at 40 Edenmore Avenue, Dublin 5. The applicant sought to increase the house size to 4 bedrooms by expanding the footprint's width and depth and adding a large rear box dormer with an increased ridge height of 8.25m. The Planning Authority refused permission, citing visual obtrusiveness on a prominent corner. The Inspector agreed that the roof alterations were unacceptabl...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.