Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority originally refused permission due to incongruous siting in a conservation area, lack of private amenity space, and non-provision of parking; however, the Inspector recommends granting permission on appeal, finding the modified proposal (omitting a solarium) integrates well with the streetscape and provides adequate amenity in a sustainable urban location.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed dwelling integrates satisfactorily into the streetscape and the established character of the residential conservation area by matching adjacent parapet heights and fenestration patterns.
- The modified site layout, which omits the solarium to increase rear garden space, provides a sufficient level of private open space and separation to protect the residential amenities of both existing and future occupants.
- A zero-parking provision is acceptable and reasonable given the site's proximity to the city centre, high-quality public transport, and shared mobility schemes, aligning with strategic goals to reduce private car dependency.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning Objective Z2Section 14.8.2Policy CHC 4Section 11.1.5.4Section 16.10.16Section 16.10
Decision Document Summary
This appeal relates to a proposed 96 sqm two-storey mews house at the rear of 10 Ashfield Road, Ranelagh, fronting onto Mornington Road within a Z2 Residential Conservation Area. Dublin City Council initially refused permission based on three grounds: negative impact on the streetscape building line, substandard private open space, and the loss of off-street parking. During the appeal, the Inspector assessed a modified proposal that included the removal of a solarium to increase the private gard...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.