20210274

Retention permission of constructed domestic garage to the rear of the property

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed retention of a 201sqm garage was refused due to its excessive scale exceeding the 80sqm limit, visual incompatibility with the rural character, and potential negative impact on residential amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The garage's floor area of 201sqm significantly exceeds the 80sqm maximum limit stipulated in the County Development Plan, resulting in a scale and appearance akin to a commercial shed.
  • The structure is visually incompatible with the host site and the surrounding rural development pattern, particularly given its backland position relative to neighboring properties.
  • The bulk, scale, and massing of the building create a propensity for activities that could generate excessive noise and disturbance, thereby harming the residential amenity of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

County Development Plan 2013-2019 (as extended) policy relating to domestic garages

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought retention permission for a 201sqm domestic garage at Ballyduff Upper, Ardamine. The application was refused as the structure's size is more than double the 80sqm limit set by the County Development Plan 2013-2019 and is visually inconsistent with the rural setting. Additionally, the planning authority raised concerns that the building's commercial-scale massing and backland location could lead to noise and disturbance, negatively impacting the residential amenity of the surro...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.