Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extensions were refused due to their visually incongruous design, overbearing impact on the roofscape, and the resulting loss of residential amenity through overlooking of neighboring properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The first-floor extension and front roof alterations are visually out of character with the streetscape and would negatively impact the visual amenity of the area.
- The proposed rear dormer extension is considered overbearing and dominant within the existing roofscape.
- The development would result in both actual and perceived overlooking of adjacent residential properties, significantly detracting from their established privacy and amenity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(i)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved a first-floor extension and alterations to the front roof profile, alongside a rear dormer extension at 14 Ludford Drive, Ballinteer. The local authority refused the application on the grounds that the front-facing elements were visually incongruous and detrimental to the streetscape character. Furthermore, the rear dormer was deemed excessively dominant and likely to cause overlooking issues for neighboring residents, failing to comply with the standards for dwelling exten...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.