Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority originally refused permission because the retention of two separate entrances was deemed to create a traffic hazard and set an undesirable precedent; however, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the existing sightlines are acceptable for the low volume of traffic generated.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The retention of Entrance Gate 1 is acceptable in this instance given the low volumes of traffic and the established context of the entrance serving an existing dwelling.
- Although sightlines do not strictly adhere to DMRB requirements, the available visibility and road alignment are sufficient to prevent the creation of a traffic hazard.
- The proposed development would not seriously injure the amenities of the area and is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective DMS126Objective DMS129Zoning RU RuralHighly Sensitive Landscape designation
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought retention permission to keep an existing vehicular entrance (Gate 1) in addition to a newer entrance (Gate 2), effectively bypassing a condition in a previous permission (F13A/0383) that required the closing of the original entrance to create a single shared access. The site is located in a rural area of Lusk, Co. Dublin, on a local road with an 80km/h speed limit. Fingal County Council's Transportation Planning Section argued that sightlines were substandard due to a bend a...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.