Core Refusal Reason
While the Planning Authority originally refused permission due to visual obtrusiveness in a residential conservation area, the Inspector recommended granting permission, concluding that the development complies with national guidelines, addresses a documented technical need for coverage, and constitutes a minor, reversible change that does not significantly injure visual amenities or architectural heritage.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development complies with national guidelines which favor utilizing existing tall buildings in suburban areas for telecommunications infrastructure rather than constructing new masts.
- A technical justification report successfully demonstrated a site-specific need for the equipment to address mobile voice and data coverage blackspots in the Dartry, Rathmines, and Rathgar areas.
- The visual impact of the antennas and dish is considered minor and subservient to the building's architectural features, ensuring the character of the residential conservation area is maintained.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy CHC4Section 9.5.11Section 16.33Section 16.33.1Policy SI 29Policy SI 30Policy 11.1.5.4Zoning Objective Z2
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for the installation of two antennas within a shrouded enclosure at the rear and a 300mm link dish at the front of Garland House, Dublin 6. Garland House is a former pseudo-Lombardic church now used as offices, situated within a Z2 Residential Conservation Area. Dublin City Council originally refused the application, citing concerns over visual clutter and negative impacts on the character of the building and wider conservation area. However, the Inspector's asse...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.