Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed rear dormer window extension was refused due to its excessive scale and bulk, which would result in visual obtrusion, an overbearing impact, and significant overlooking of neighboring properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The dormer extension's scale and bulk are visually obtrusive and overbearing to the surrounding context.
- The development would cause significant actual and perceived overlooking of the property to the east.
- The proposal contravenes Section 8.2.3.4 (i) of the County Development Plan and would depreciate property values in the vicinity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4 (i)
Decision Document Summary
The application at 13 Headford Grove, Churchtown, sought permission and retention permission for a ground floor extension and a first-floor rear dormer window. While the planning authority granted retention for the ground floor works, they refused the dormer extension. The refusal was based on the determination that the dormer's excessive scale and bulk would be visually obtrusive and cause significant overlooking issues for the property to the east, thereby injuring the residential amenities an...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.