Core Refusal Reason
The proposed dormer exceeds the ridge height of the existing dwelling, resulting in an adverse visual impact and non-compliance with design guidelines and zoning objectives.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed dormer roof projects at an upward angle higher than the existing ridge height, making it visually obtrusive and dominant.
- The design fails to comply with the SDCC House Extension Guide, which requires dormers to be set below the ridge and above the eaves.
- The development would negatively impact residential amenity and set an undesirable precedent, contradicting the 'RES' zoning objective and proper planning principles.
Cited Policies (CDP)
SDCC County Development Plan 2016-2022SDCC House Extension Design Guide 2010Section 4 Part (IV)RES zoning objective
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves converting the attic of a mid-terrace two-storey dwelling at 48 Raheen Close, Dublin 24, into a room featuring a flat dormer roof. The application was refused because the dormer's height would exceed the existing roof ridge, creating a significant adverse visual impact. This design violates specific local planning guidelines regarding dormer placement and height, fails to protect the residential amenity of the area as per the 'RES' zoning objective, and is deemed contrary t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.