Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommends granting permission because the proposed development, subject to a modification requiring a setback from the northern boundary to avoid a 'terracing effect,' is considered visually harmonious with the pattern of development in the area and will not seriously injure the residential amenities of the neighborhood.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development is acceptable in principle under the residential zoning objective 'A' and complies with the general policies of the County Development Plan regarding the adaptation of existing housing stock.
- The first-floor side extension must be amended by condition to ensure it does not extend beyond the established side elevation of the dwelling, thereby preventing an undesirable terracing effect and protecting the streetscape character.
- Impacts on the residential amenity of the adjoining property (no. 28), specifically regarding overshadowing and loss of outlook, are considered acceptable provided the recommended setbacks from the shared boundary are implemented.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning Objective 'A'Policy Objective PHP19: Existing Housing Stock – AdaptationPolicy Objective PHP20: Protection of Existing Residential AmenitySection 12.3.7.1: Extensions to DwellingsSection 12.4.8.1: General SpecificationsSection 12.4.8.3: Driveways/Hardstanding AreasSection 12.8.7: Private Amenity StandardsSection 12.8.7.1: Separation DistancesSection 12.8.7.2: BoundariesPolicy Objective CA7: Construction Materials
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a third-party appeal against the decision of Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council to grant permission for significant extensions at 30 Linden Grove, Blackrock. The proposal involves the demolition of rear extensions and the construction of a front single-storey extension, a two-storey side extension built over an undercroft passage, and a two-storey rear extension. The site is located in a mature cul-de-sac of semi-detached houses. The primary grounds of appeal centered on ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP