Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended modifying a restrictive condition to allow a full gable roof instead of a Dutch gable, concluding that the proposed rear dormer and rooflights were acceptable and consistent with the evolving character of the residential area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A simple full gable roof is less visually obtrusive and more traditional than a Dutch gable, and will not negatively impact residential amenity via overshadowing.
- The proposed rear dormer complies with Development Plan standards regarding scale and setback, and does not unduly overlook or overbear neighboring properties.
- The inclusion of rooflights is supported by local precedents and provides necessary natural light without detracting from the character of the streetscape.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning objective Z1Section 16.10.12Appendix 17 (Volume 2)Section 17.11
Decision Document Summary
The application relates to an attic conversion at 21 Killester Park, a semi-detached dwelling within a 'Z1' residential zone. The proposal included changing the roof profile from hipped to a Dutch gable, adding a rear dormer, and installing rooflights. While the Planning Authority granted permission, they attached Condition No. 3 which required the retention of the hipped profile and a significant reduction in the dormer's scale. The Inspector argued that the area has a mix of modified roof prof...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP