D21B/0193

Permission is sought for [1]

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

This was a First Party appeal against a condition requiring the omission of dormer window extensions; the Inspector concluded the condition was unwarranted as the proposed works constitute unobtrusive alterations that do not negatively impact the visual or residential amenities of the area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed dormer extensions represent relatively minor increases in width to existing structures and would be read as unobtrusive alterations that sit comfortably within the existing roof profile.
  • The development will not result in any significant negative impacts on the residential amenities of adjoining dwellings due to generous separation distances and the heavily vegetated nature of the site boundaries.
  • Strict application of dormer extension policy is inappropriate in this context; the removal of Condition No. 2 is recommended to facilitate the modernisation of the dwelling while remaining consistent with the County Development Plan.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 8.2.3.4(i) - Extensions to DwellingsSection 8.2.3.4 - Additional Accommodation in Existing Built-up AreasSection 8.2.3.5 - Residential Development – General RequirementsObjective 'A' - Land Use ZoningPolicy UD1 - Urban Design Principles

Decision Document Summary

The application relates to 'Roan Carraig', a detached 197sqm dormer bungalow on an irregular site in Dalkey. The proposal includes a single-storey extension, window replacement, and the extension of existing dormer windows on both the front and rear elevations. While the Planning Authority granted permission, they attached Condition No. 2 requiring the omission of the dormer extensions based on concerns regarding massing and bulk under Section 8.2.3.4 of the CDP. The Inspector's assessment found...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP