WEB1465/21

The proposed Development will consist of first floor partial demolition to form openings in the gable end wall to the side of existing house and proposed construction of a new first floor extension over existing single storey extension to the side and rear of the existing house with pitched roof. Proposed new extension comprising new bedroom with en-suite shower room, home study and shower room. Proposed minor internal modifications and decoration to the existing house and associated site ancillary works.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

Grant of permission: The development is consistent with the 'Z1' residential zoning objective of the Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022 and complies with quantitative standards for plot ratio and site coverage without adversely impacting the residential amenities of neighbouring properties.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed first-floor extension is reasonable in scale and architectural treatment, ensuring it does not constitute overdevelopment or an overbearing presence on the corner site.
  • The development will not result in significant overlooking or loss of privacy due to the orientation of windows, the use of obscure glazing on side elevations, and adequate separation distances from neighbouring rear windows.
  • No undue loss of light or overshadowing will occur to the adjacent property at 148 McKee Avenue, as the extension is sufficiently set back 5.8m from the northern boundary.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Land Use Zoning Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods)Chapter 16 (Development Management Standards)Section 16.2.2.3 (Alterations and Extensions)Indicative plot ratio for Z1 zones (0.5 to 2.0)Indicative site coverage for Z1 zone (45-60%)

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns a first-floor extension of 40 sq m over an existing single-storey extension at 146 McKee Avenue, Finglas East. The site contains a semi-detached dwelling within a 'Z1' residential zone. The proposal was appealed by a third party (Mr. Brian Lally) on grounds of overdevelopment, loss of light, and devaluation of property. The Inspector argued that the development is sensitively designed, subordinate to the existing house, and adheres to the Dublin City Development Plan's stand...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP