Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is considered to be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, as it would not seriously injure the visual amenities of the locality or the residential amenities of adjoining properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Inspector determined that the proposed 3.05m high extension is modest in scale, visually compatible with the existing dwelling, and consistent with the established pattern of development in the area.
- Potential overshadowing and daylight loss concerns raised by the neighbor at No. 48 were assessed as minimal, especially when compared to the impact of existing boundary walls and sheds in the intervening space.
- Structural concerns regarding the party wall were dismissed as no works are proposed to the boundary itself, and the plans maintain a 150mm separation distance from the common boundary.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4 (i)Section 8.2.3.5Land Use Zoning Objective 'A'
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for a 13sqm single-storey, flat-roofed side extension and associated internal modifications at 50 Weirview Drive, Stillorgan. The site contains a semi-detached house in a mature residential area zoned Objective 'A' (to protect and/or improve residential amenities). While the Planning Authority granted permission, a third-party appeal was lodged by a neighbor citing concerns over overshadowing and structural integrity. The Inspector noted that the streetscape alre...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP