Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission on the basis of poor residential amenity and non-compliance with standards for family flats/subdivision; however, the Inspector recommended granting permission, finding that the extension integrates well with the existing dwelling and does not negatively impact neighboring amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 70 sq m single-storey extension is acceptable in principle under the 'A' zoning and integrates successfully with the character and scale of the existing large detached house.
- The development provides adequate residential amenity for its intended use (latter-life living for the occupants) and, due to its single-storey design and hipped roof, does not result in overlooking or overbearing impacts on adjacent properties.
- While the Planning Authority viewed the extension as a separate unit, it is functionally interlinked with the main house, and any concerns regarding future subdivision can be mitigated by planning conditions.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective ASection 8.2.3Section 8.2.3.1Section 8.2.3.2Section 8.2.3.4Section 8.2.3.4(iii)Section 8.2.3.6(vi)
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a First Party appeal against the refusal of permission for a 70 sq m single-storey extension to a large detached house at Bellevue House, Leopardstown Road, Dublin 18. The Planning Authority's refusal was based on concerns that the proposal provided poor residential amenity and effectively created a 'distinct residential unit' without meeting the specific standards of Section 8.2.3.4 of the County Development Plan regarding family flats. A neighboring resident also object...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála