2700/21

Permission for construction of a single storey extension to the rear, a first floor extension to the side, the conversion of the attic roof space incorporating the changing of the side roof profile from hip end to gable end profile and the installation of Velux type rooflights to the front and rear roof slopes.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended the omission of Conditions 4 and 9, concluding that the proposed gable roof profile and rooflights are consistent with the character of the area and would not negatively impact visual or residential amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed change from a hipped to a gable roof is consistent with the established character of the area, specifically referencing adjacent terraces on Kincora Court that feature gable ends.
  • The proposed rooflights on both the front and rear elevations are acceptable as they do not result in overlooking due to the roof slope and have minimal impact on the visual amenity of the streetscape.
  • Condition 4 (regarding roof design/windows) and Condition 9 (regarding entrance works) should be omitted as they are either unnecessary for protecting amenity or relate to works not included in the original application.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Objective Z1Section 16.10.12Appendix 17Section 17.11

Decision Document Summary

This first-party appeal relates to Condition 4 of Dublin City Council's decision to grant permission for a residential extension at 210 Kincora Road, Clontarf. The development consists of a ground-floor rear extension, a first-floor side extension, an attic conversion, and a roof profile change from hipped to gable. The Planning Authority originally sought to retain the hipped roof and limit rooflights to protect visual and residential amenity. The Inspector argued that the surrounding context i...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP