Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority refused permission due to the overbearing impact on the neighboring property to the east (No. 21) and a discordant roof profile; however, the Inspector recommended granting permission, finding that the design is subservient and does not unduly affect residential or visual amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is acceptable in principle as it is located in an area zoned for residential amenity.
- The scale, massing, and 6.845m setback of the extension ensure it will not have an overbearing impact on the streetscape or the adjoining property at No. 21 Louvain.
- The proposal will not cause undue loss of privacy or overshadowing and complies with the design principles set out in Section 8.2.3.4(i) of the County Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2016-2022Section 8.2.3.4(i)Zoning Objective A
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks planning permission for a 46 sq m second-storey side extension and rear return refurbishment at 23 Louvain, Ardilea, a detached dwelling in a low-density suburban estate. The site is characterized by an elongated shape and staggered building lines. The Planning Authority initially refused the proposal, citing an overbearing impact on No. 21 Louvain and concerns over the visual discordance of the roof profile. The Inspector's assessment found that the extension is subservien...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP