Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that while the Planning Authority's concerns regarding the roof design were valid, they could be resolved via a condition for a hipped roof to mitigate overbearing impacts on neighboring properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension is consistent with the 'RES' zoning objective to protect and/or improve residential amenity.
- A revised hipped roof design, to be secured by condition, would integrate the extension with existing structures and minimize the overbearing impact on the property to the west.
- The extension provides necessary wheelchair-accessible facilities that improve the occupant's quality of life without constituting overdevelopment or harming the character of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 2.4.1Policy H18Policy H18, Objective 2Section 11.3.3(i)South Dublin County Council Extension Design Guide 2010
Decision Document Summary
This report evaluates a first-party appeal against South Dublin County Council's decision to refuse permission for a 14sqm single-storey rear extension at 17 Palmerstown Drive, Dublin 20. The development was intended to provide a wheelchair-accessible bedroom and bathroom. The Planning Authority refused the application on the grounds that it was haphazard, out of character, and overbearing. The Inspector, however, argued that the principle of the extension is acceptable under the South Dublin Co...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.