Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended granting permission, concluding that the development would integrate satisfactorily with the existing built environment and not seriously injure residential amenities, provided specific modifications are made regarding boundary setbacks and the retention of heritage features.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of altering and extending the 1920s dwelling is acceptable, as the building is not a protected structure and has undergone previous unsympathetic alterations.
- The proposed massing and scale of the extension in close proximity to the northern boundary (No. 27) would be excessively overbearing and requires significant setbacks to mitigate impact on neighbor amenity.
- Heritage features, specifically the decorative red brick gate piers and original chimneys, should be retained to preserve the character of the Marlborough Road candidate Architectural Conservation Area (cACA).
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4 (i)Section 8.2.3.4 (xiv)Policy AR17Policy AR5Policy AR 8
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the demolition of existing extensions and the construction of a substantial two-storey extension to the front, side, and rear of a detached house at 28 Marlborough Road, Glenageary. The site is located within a candidate Architectural Conservation Area (cACA) known for its Victorian and Arts & Crafts style dwellings. While the Planning Authority initially refused permission due to concerns over overbearing appearance and erosion of architectural character, the Inspector fou...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála