Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out under the original permission (16/403) as required by Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposal does not comply with the statutory requirements of subsection 42(1)(a)(i)(II) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
- No substantial works have been carried out on the site pursuant to the original planning permission (16/403).
- The Planning Authority is legally precluded from granting an extension of duration for the development due to the lack of physical progress.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for the construction of a dwelling and associated site works at South Lake Road, Cappanclare, Inchigeela, Macroom, Co. Cork, originally permitted under reference 16/403. The application was refused because it failed to meet the legislative threshold for an extension, specifically the requirement to prove that substantial works had been completed during the initial permission period. As the site lacked significant construction progress, the Planning A...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.