D21A/0573

Permission is sought for demolition of existing

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Inspector recommended overturning the Planning Authority's refusal, concluding that the proposed development would not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area, is consistent with the character of the Dalkey Village Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) due to its limited visibility and prior alterations, and accords with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed works will not be overtly visible from the public road and thus will not diminish the integrity of the vistas or the character of the Dalkey Village Architectural Conservation Area.
  • The roof profile has already been significantly altered by previous permissions, and the subject building is not a protected structure, meaning the proposed changes do not unacceptably erode its special architectural character.
  • Residential amenity impacts, specifically regarding overlooking of the adjacent 'Rockfort House', are mitigated by existing mature tree screening and the recessed design of the new terrace area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy AR5Policy AR8Policy AR12Section 6.1.3Section 6.1.4Section 8.2.3Section 8.2.3.4(i)Section 8.2.11Section 8.2.11.3(i)

Decision Document Summary

The application relates to a semi-detached Victorian house, 'Juverna', located within the Dalkey Village ACA. The proposal involves the demolition of an existing hipped roof and glazed extension to facilitate a 5 sq.m attic extension, an increase in roof height of 600mm, and a new external terrace. The Planning Authority originally refused permission, citing negative impacts on the ACA and the erosion of traditional roof forms. The Inspector, however, argued that the rear return of the house is ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála