Core Planning Reasoning
The development is considered consistent with the residential zoning objectives of the area and proper planning, provided that conditions protecting neighboring privacy (opaque glazing) are maintained and statutory financial contributions for additional floor area are paid.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- Condition No. 2 requiring fixed opaque glazing in the south-facing first-floor corner window is necessary to prevent intrusive overlooking of the private amenity space of the neighboring property at No. 44A Ballinteer Drive.
- Financial contributions required under Conditions 8, 9, and 10 were correctly calculated based on the additional 22sqm of floor area and the 1.25x 'penalty' multiplier applicable to retention permissions.
- Condition No. 5 should be amended to ensure the entire property is occupied as a single residential unit, prohibiting its sale or use as a separate commercial office while still allowing for ancillary home-working.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3: Residential DevelopmentSection 8.2.3.4: Additional Accommodation in Existing Built-up Areas: (i) Extensions to DwellingsSection 8.2.3.5: Residential Development – General Requirements
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal against five conditions of a retention permission for a 22sqm two-storey rear extension at 44 Ballinteer Drive. The site is located in a suburban area zoned 'A' (to protect residential amenity). The primary points of contention involved a new first-floor corner window, which neighbors argued caused overlooking, and the imposition of development contributions. Additionally, observers raised concerns regarding unauthorized commercial use due to 'Notary Pub...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP