3048/21

Permission for the following to the existing end of terrace two storey house with adjoining two storey flat roof side extension with single storey extension to rear: Permission to demolish existing adjoining side & rear extension. Permission requested to redesign the existing original end of terrace house with a single storey tile roof extension to front with a redesign of the interior on both floors with glazing-door openings changed to accommodate new layout. Permission requested to erect a two storey fully service detached dwelling with single storey extension to front and rear. Alterations to boundary walls to accommodate new layout. Maintain connection to existing drainage and allow new connection for proposed house and all ancillary site works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal constitutes overdevelopment of a restricted site, failing to meet minimum residential quality standards and causing significant negative impacts on the amenities of neighboring properties.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The siting, scale, and massing of the dwelling represent an overdevelopment that would appear dominant and incongruous within the existing urban context.
  • The development provides substandard internal bedroom floor areas and insufficient private open space for a 3-bed, 6-person house, contrary to national and local guidelines.
  • The proximity of the structure to the rear of properties on Long Lane would create an overbearing impact and adversely affect daylight and sunlight for neighboring residents.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 16.10.2Section 16.10.10Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involved the construction of a new dwelling at No.1 Coolevin Road, Dublin 8, on a restricted end-of-terrace site. Dublin City Council refused permission because the development was considered an overdevelopment that would negatively impact the character of the area. Furthermore, the house failed to meet mandatory residential quality standards for internal space and private gardens, while its proximity to existing homes on Long Lane was deemed to have a detrimental overbearing effect...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.