Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended that Condition No. 3 (reducing the dormer width) be deleted, concluding that the proposed 4.2-metre width is acceptable as it is not visible from the public realm, provides improved internal accommodation, and maintains a reasonable scale relative to the roof slope without injuring residential amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed dormer width of 4.2 metres is considered visually subordinate to the roof slope and remains below the ridge and above the eaves, maintaining sufficient separation from the roof edges.
- As the rear roof slope is not visible from the public realm, the modification does not negatively impact the streetscape or the architectural character of the area.
- There is established local precedent for similar larger dormer structures, and the proposal is consistent with the proper planning and sustainable development of the Z1 zoned area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 16.10.12Section 16.38.9Appendix 17Section 17.11
Decision Document Summary
The application concerns the modification of a previously permitted rear dormer at 2 Arranmore Road, Donnybrook, to increase its width to 4.2 metres. Dublin City Council granted permission but included Condition No. 3 to limit the width to 3.2 metres, citing concerns over excessive scale. The applicant appealed this condition, arguing that the reduction was unnecessary for the 'Z1' zoned site and that the larger size was required to accommodate a bathroom ensuite and standard ceiling heights. Th...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP