Core Refusal Reason
The proposed second-floor extension is visually dominant due to its height, scale, and massing, resulting in a negative impact on the streetscape and non-compliance with development plan standards for roof alterations.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The height, scale, and massing of the proposed development would result in a visually dominant roof extension that negatively impacts the character of the streetscape.
- The proposal fails to comply with Section 12.3.7.1 of the Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2022-2028 regarding alterations at roof and attic level.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments in the area and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the locality.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought planning permission for the addition of a second floor to an existing property at 5A Sefton, Rochestown Avenue, Dun Laoghaire. The local authority refused the application on the grounds that the scale and design of the extension would be visually intrusive and out of character with the surrounding streetscape. The decision specifically cited a failure to adhere to County Development Plan policies regarding roof alterations and expressed concern that the development would esta...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.